科目组合
英语二: 英语知识运用 、阅读理解 、翻译 、写作
AFGCE
评分及理由
(1)得分及理由(满分2分)
学生答案:A,标准答案:A。答案正确,得2分。
(2)得分及理由(满分2分)
学生答案:F,标准答案:F。答案正确,得2分。
(3)得分及理由(满分2分)
学生答案:G,标准答案:G。答案正确,得2分。
(4)得分及理由(满分2分)
学生答案:C,标准答案:C。答案正确,得2分。
(5)得分及理由(满分2分)
学生答案:E,标准答案:E。答案正确,得2分。
题目总分:2+2+2+2+2=10分
当发展中国家的人民担心移民问题时,他们通常是担忧本国最优化和最聪明的人纷纷离开,前往硅谷或者发达国家的医院和大学工作。这些人正是英国、加拿大和澳大利亚等国家,试图通过向大学毕业生提供优惠的移民政策来吸引的人才。
大量的研究发现来自发展中国家的受过良好教育的人尤其可能移民。2004年,在对印度家庭开展的一项大规模调查中发现,将近40%的移民接受过高中以上教育,相比之下,全印度年龄在25岁以上接受过高中以上教育的人大约只占3.3%
这种“人才流失”现象长期困扰着贫困国家的决策者。他们害怕这会损害本国经济,使他们失去急需的计数人才,这些人本可以留在国内的大学任教、在医院工作或设计出新颖的产品供工厂生产
评分及理由
(1)得分及理由(满分5分)
第一段翻译准确流畅,关键信息完整。"best and brightest"译为"最优化和最聪明的人"虽与标准答案"最优秀、最聪明的人才"略有差异但意思正确。"privilege college graduates"译为"向大学毕业生提供优惠的移民政策"准确。得5分。
(2)得分及理由(满分5分)
第二段翻译准确,数据表达清晰。"well-educated people"译为"受过良好教育的人"正确。印度家庭调查数据翻译准确,对比关系表达清楚。得5分。
(3)得分及理由(满分5分)
第三段整体翻译良好,但存在一处逻辑错误:"计数人才"应为"技术人才"或"熟练劳动者",这是明显的错译,影响理解。其他部分如"brain drain"译为"人才流失"、"clever new products"译为"新颖的产品"都准确。因存在一处逻辑错误,扣1分,得4分。
题目总分:5+5+4=14分
Dere Sir or Madam,
I bought an electronic dictionary from your online store on January 1st, but after using it for a short period of time, I found it has some problems.
To begin with, the battery needs recharging after a more 2 hours of use. This means that I need to carry my charter with me when I go out for a day. In addition, the buttons on the electronic dictionary are so small that it is nearly impossible to type anything with them. Personally, I find this to be completely unacceptable.
Therefore, I would like either to change for another model that works better or a full refund. Your help is greatly appreciated.
Your sincerely,
Zhang Wei
评分及理由
(1)内容完整性(满分3分)
得分:3分
理由:内容完整覆盖所有要点。邮件明确说明了投诉原因(电池续航短、按键过小)和解决方案要求(更换型号或全额退款),完全符合题目要求。
(2)语言表达(满分4分)
得分:3分
理由:存在少量语言错误但不影响理解。具体错误包括:
- "Dere" 应为 "Dear"(拼写错误)
- "a more 2 hours" 应为 "more than 2 hours"(语法错误)
- "carry my charter" 应为 "carry my charger"(拼写错误)
- "change for another model" 应为 "exchange for another model"(搭配不当)
- "Your sincerely" 应为 "Yours sincerely"(格式错误)
(3)格式与语域(满分3分)
得分:2分
理由:格式基本正确但存在明显错误。邮件结构完整,包含称呼、正文、结束语和签名,但结束语"Your sincerely"存在拼写错误。语域基本恰当,使用了正式的书信语气。
题目总分:3+3+2=8分
The table clearly reflects the statistics of staff's job satisfaction in a certain company. According to the data given above, we can conclude that the percentage of people satisfied with their jobs is the highest among those over 50 years old, at about 40%. In contrast, the percentage of the staff not satisfied with their jobs is about 64% among those in their forties, the highest among all the three age groups.
The major determinant of satisfaction lies in people's attitude. On the one hand, staff members in their forties usually have to undertake a lot of reponsibilities from both their families and their careers. So, they have the least satisfaction in their jobs. On the other hand, people over 50 generally have shifted their life goals from achieving the ultimate success to a relatively easy and comfrotable life, and therefore are inclined to be much more satisfied with their jobs.
In view of the above reasoning, I am convinced that it is difficult for everyone to be content with their jobs. And it is advisable that people should adjust their expectations for work, and that companies should pay more attention to the welfare to their staff.
评分及理由
(1)内容完整性(满分5分):得分4分
学生基本完成了表格描述任务:准确指出了50岁以上员工满意度最高(40%)和41-50岁员工不满意度最高(64%)这两个关键数据。但遗漏了其他重要信息:未提及≤40岁组"不清楚"占比50%的重要特征,也未完整呈现三组人群的满意度分布全貌。根据评分标准第三档"虽然漏掉了一些内容,但包含多数内容要点",扣1分。
(2)语言表达(满分5分):得分4分
语法结构和词汇使用基本恰当,能有效表达观点。但存在少量语言错误:如"reponsibilities"拼写错误(应为responsibilities),"comfrotable"拼写错误(应为comfortable),"the staff not satisfied"语法表达不够准确(应为staff who are not satisfied)。整体语言流畅度较好,符合第二档"语言基本准确,只有在试图使用较复杂结构时才有个别错误"的标准,扣1分。
(3)结构与逻辑(满分5分):得分3分
文章结构完整,包含描述、分析和建议三部分。但逻辑分析存在明显问题:将满意度差异完全归因于个人态度和生活阶段,忽略了公司管理、工作环境等客观因素,这种单一归因方式不够全面合理。建议部分虽然合理但缺乏深度。根据评分标准第三档"采用了简单的衔接手法,内容基本连贯",且考虑到逻辑分析的片面性,扣2分。
题目总分:4+4+3=11分