科目组合
英语二: 英语知识运用 、阅读理解 、翻译 、写作
FEGCD
评分及理由
(1)得分及理由(满分2分)
学生答案:F。与标准答案一致。第41段强调提前规划每周菜单、制作购物清单,对应"Planning is everything"。得2分。
(2)得分及理由(满分2分)
学生答案:E。与标准答案一致。第42段提到在超市购买精确需要的分量,避免购买预包装的多余食物,对应"Stick to what you need"。得2分。
(3)得分及理由(满分2分)
学生答案:G。与标准答案一致。第43段强调利用剩余食材制作汤或果汁,避免浪费,对应"Waste not, want not"。得2分。
(4)得分及理由(满分2分)
学生答案:C。与标准答案一致。第44段建议与店主建立友好关系以获得免费食材,对应"Shopkeepers are your friends"。得2分。
(5)得分及理由(满分2分)
学生答案:D。与标准答案一致。第45段建议定期在餐厅犒劳自己,对应"Remember to treat yourself"。得2分。
题目总分:2+2+2+2+2=10分
我能从过去53年的日子里挑一个并且能立刻当时知道我在哪,发生了什么新闻,甚至是一周的周几。 我从4岁起就能够做到这个了。
我从不觉得我的大脑会因吸取了大量的信息而感到难以承受。我的脑海似乎能够处理并且整齐有序地存储这些信息。当我想到了一些不好的回忆,我与其他人做的一样,也就是把它搁置在一个角落里。我不觉得这对我来说是困难的,因为我的记忆很清晰。高效的记忆没有让我的情绪更加敏感或鲜明生动。我能够回忆起那天祖父离世,当我们在前一天赶去医院时的悲伤。我也能记住在同一天,百老汇表演的音乐剧Hair,两者以同样的方式骤然进入我的脑海中。
评分及理由
(1)得分及理由(满分15分)
第一段翻译整体准确,但存在两处可改进的细节:
- "挑一个"可优化为"挑一天"更符合中文习惯;
- "发生了什么新闻"建议调整为"新闻报道了什么"更贴近原文"what happened in the news"的被动语态。
第二段存在三处明显偏差:
- "不好的回忆"未能准确传达"sad memory"的悲伤情感色彩;
- "因为我的记忆很清晰"与前文形成因果逻辑错误(原文是否定结构);
- "高效的记忆"与"强大的记忆力"存在语义差异;
- 专有名词《Hair》未按规范翻译为《发胶》。
基于上述分析,扣除4分,本项得分11分。
题目总分:11分
Dear Fellow Classmates,
Our class is to hold a charity sale to raise money for those childre who are in need of help on January 5, 2016. As the monitor of our class, I'm calling on all students to take part in the sale.
We ask you to donate as much as you can to a fund we have set up to cover these children's tuition fees and other expenses. Unless we can raise sufficient money, those poor kids won't be able to afford to finish their educationj.
As a nation renowned worldwide for its many virtues, China and its people have been giving a helping hand to those who are in distress throught history. It's our duty to provide as much support as we can to those in need. Please contribute generously.
Yours sincerely,
Li Ming
评分及理由
(1)内容完整性(满分3分)
得分:2分
理由:内容基本覆盖了主要要点,包括通知慈善义卖活动和鼓励参与。但存在以下问题:1)活动具体细节不够完整(如具体时间、地点等仅提到日期);2)将"charity sale"误解为直接捐款活动,与题目要求的"义卖"形式不符,这是关键内容偏差。
(2)语言表达(满分4分)
得分:3分
理由:语言基本流畅,但有明显错误:1)"childre"拼写错误;2)"educationj"拼写错误;3)"throught"应为"throughout";4)部分表达不够自然,如"China and its people have been giving..."与班级义卖的直接关联性不强。
(3)格式与逻辑(满分3分)
得分:2分
理由:格式基本正确,包含邮件基本要素。但逻辑存在明显问题:将"charity sale"理解为直接捐款,这与题目要求不符,属于逻辑错误。语域基本恰当,但部分内容与班级邮件情境不够贴合。
题目总分:2+3+2=7分
The column chart clearly reveals the statistics of students taking part-time jobs in a certain university. According to the survey, there has been a steady increase from 67.77% to 71.93% of students from freshmen to juniors holding temporary jobs, while the percentage of seniors working part-time has jumped markedly to 88.24%.
While part-time work does have the potential to negatively affect college students'studies, it can also be good for their future careers. It's obvious that doing a part-time job can adversely affect students'studies because it drains their energy. Part-time employment can also be detrimental to students by damaging their incentive to study. Despite the above disadvantages, working part-time on campus also offers several potential benefits. For one thing, it can help students better understand their preferences or to test out a possible career direction. Additionally, companies seeking to recruit fresh graduates will give preference to those with part-time experience.
In the end, the impact of part-time work on students'academic performance depends on their ability to maintain a balance between their studies and the part-time job.
评分及理由
(1)内容要点(满分5分)
得分:4分
理由:学生较好地完成了图表解读任务,准确描述了各年级兼职比例的变化趋势(从大一到大三稳步上升,大四显著增长)。评论部分讨论了兼职的利弊(影响学业vs促进职业发展),并给出了平衡的观点。但评论部分未能深入分析图表数据背后的原因(如大四兼职比例激增可能与求职需求相关),内容深度稍显不足。
(2)语言质量(满分5分)
得分:4分
理由:使用了较丰富的语法结构(如让步状语从句"While...", "Despite...")和词汇(detrimental, incentive, preference等)。存在少量语言错误:
- "students'studies" 应改为 "students' studies"(所有格后需空格)
- "it's obvious" 口语化表达,学术写作中建议用 "It is evident"
整体语言流畅度良好,错误不影响理解。
(3)篇章结构(满分5分)
得分:4分
理由:文章结构清晰,遵循"描述图表-利弊分析-总结观点"的逻辑脉络。使用了适当的衔接手段(While, Despite, For one thing, Additionally, In the end)。但段落间过渡略显生硬,结尾段未能与图表数据形成更强呼应。
题目总分:4+4+4=12分